============================================================ ObjectMon::summary(): Run 178440 Events: 8511 started at 178440 ended at 178440 ------------------------------------------------------------ For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the ObjectMon web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ============================================================ ------------------------------- TimeMonitor:: proccesssed 8511 events General Decision - run is GOOD Reference file used: /data1/consumer/referenceFiles/ObjectMon/TimeMonitor_physics.root The cutoffs for the used methods are: method: Komogorov cutoff: 0.01 method: Chi2 cutoff: 5 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 13 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 274 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 274 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 0 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 220 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 220 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 1 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 1538 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 3745 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 3.19419 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 3745 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Chi2 returned 17.7021 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 1411 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 2969 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.96886 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 2969 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Chi2 returned 24.9274 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 460 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.60608 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 460 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Chi2 returned 47.6039 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 50 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 527 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 529 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 529 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 15581 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 17058 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 17058 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 30855 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 33979 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.03062 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 33979 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.67395 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 10816 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 12405 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.58064 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 12405 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.02513 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 33440 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.77581 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 33440 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 4.73498 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 26499 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 774 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 776 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 776 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 20139 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 21845 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 21845 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 39311 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 43386 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.51365 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 43386 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 3.49896 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 13638 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 15728 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.59396 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 15728 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.51759 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 43173 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.29202 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 43173 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 4.9779 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 34491 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 799 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 813 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 813 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 19972 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 21477 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 21477 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 39717 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 43829 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.75675 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 43829 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.70531 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 13827 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 16419 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.5258 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 16419 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.22123 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 42328 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.13394 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 42328 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 3.75009 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 33615 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 894 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 897 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 897 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 21824 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 23243 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 23243 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 45015 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 49298 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.99828 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 49298 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.92565 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 15210 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 17475 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.6931 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 17475 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.41853 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 46746 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.71982 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 46746 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 4.89268 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 37429 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 114 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 127 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 127 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 3173 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 3519 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 3519 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 6165 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 7155 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.25671 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 7155 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.04012 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 2180 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 2620 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.04504 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 2620 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.51988 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 7506 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.03232 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 7506 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.2989 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 5767 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 1201 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 1214 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 1214 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 34789 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 36739 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 36739 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 71852 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 79006 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.37352 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 79006 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.82386 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 24943 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 30168 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 3.02049 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 30168 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.10793 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 74202 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.59281 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 74202 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 3.90351 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 59791 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 1963 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 1980 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 1980 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 50946 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 53847 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 53847 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 105378 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 115665 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.38121 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 115665 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.62685 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 36070 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 42331 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.06663 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 42331 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.00111 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 108106 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.28547 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 108106 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 5.14202 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 87007 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 152 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 152 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 152 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 2709 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 2837 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 2837 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 6207 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 6879 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.32141 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 6879 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.912633 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 2085 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 2434 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.863987 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 2434 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.04782 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 5799 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.660912 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 5799 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.52218 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 4734 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 1462 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 1469 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 1469 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 32778 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 34242 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 34242 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 69150 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 75877 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.19968 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 75877 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.20831 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 23661 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 27887 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.73099 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 27887 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.26396 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 68753 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.67504 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 68753 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 3.29595 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 55786 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 ----- Bad/Improved EMTiming channels summary ----- bad channels reference file was taken from run#177416 cuts used for every tower were (current/old): minimal high efficiency: 0.95/0.95 maximal # of low width hits: 5/4 maximal # of multifirings: 5/4 maximal # of fake firings: 3/3 wedge rapd Failures: 100% LowW Multi Fake Change Status 0 -5 11/11 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 5 10/00 0/0 0/0 0/0 New Problem 23 4 11/11 0/0 0/0 0/0 The following information could be put into the new bad channels reference file: 178440 4 0.95 5 5 3 0 20 3 0 31 1 23 30 3 ================================================== JetMonitor::summary(): Run 178440 Events 8511 ================================================== For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the JetMonitor web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html -------------------------------------------------- Histogram name Check Result -------------------------------------------------- jet_nJets Zero Bin empty Low statistics jet_nJets slope neg. from bin 2 Low statistics jet_nJets mean > 1.6 Low statistics jet_nJets mean < 4.0 Low statistics JCl-071_sumEt mean > 40.0 Low statistics JCl-071_sumEt mean < 200.0 Low statistics JCl-071_eta mean < 0.25 Low statistics JCl-071_eta mean > -0.25 Low statistics JCl-071_eta [-3.0;-1.0] * 0.5 < [1.0;3.0] Low statistics JCl-071_eta [-3.0;-1.0] * 1.5 > [1.0;3.0] Low statistics -------------------------------------------------- Histogram name Result Chi^2 1.) phi Njet Central low statistics 2.) phi Njet East Plug low statistics 3.) phi Njet West Plug low statistics ================================================== General decision for Run 178440 => UNDEFINED ================================================== ====================================================================== MetMonitor::summary(): Run 178440 Events: 8511 ====================================================================== metmet Good #chi^{2}= 1.9 (< 5) metphi Good #chi^{2}=0.98 (< 5) metphicut35 Good #chi^{2}= 1 (< 5) metphicut45 Low Stat Low Stat metexSum Good #chi^{2}= 1.5 (< 5) meteySum Good #chi^{2}= 1.7 (< 5) meteSum Good #chi^{2}= 4.9 (< 5) metetSum Good #chi^{2}= 4.4 (< 5) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- metmet Good #chi^{2}= 1.9 (< 5) metphi Good #chi^{2}=0.98 (< 5) metphicut35 Good #chi^{2}= 1 (< 5) metphicut45 Low Stat Low Stat metexSum Good #chi^{2}= 1.5 (< 5) meteySum Good #chi^{2}= 1.7 (< 5) meteSum Good #chi^{2}= 4.9 (< 5) metetSum Good #chi^{2}= 4.4 (< 5) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ====================================================================== ====================================================================== EMMonitor::summary(): Run 178440 Events: 8511 ====================================================================== emEtaevent Good #chi^{2}= 1.4 (< 5) emPhi Good #chi^{2}=0.99 (< 5) emEnergy Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 5) hadEm Good #chi^{2}=0.78 (< 5) emEt Good #chi^{2}= 1.7 (< 5) elecEtaevent Good #chi^{2}= 1.7 (< 5) elecPhi Good #chi^{2}= 1 (< 5) elecEnergy Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 5) elechadEm Good #chi^{2}=0.76 (< 5) elecEt Good #chi^{2}= 1.4 (< 5) positEtaevent Good #chi^{2}=0.74 (< 5) positPhi Good #chi^{2}= 0.6 (< 5) positEnergy Good #chi^{2}=0.93 (< 5) posithadEm Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 5) positEt Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 5) photonEtaevent Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 5) photonPhi Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 5) photonEnergy Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 5) photonhadEm Good #chi^{2}=0.76 (< 5) photonEt Good #chi^{2}= 3.6 (< 5) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- emEtaevent Good #chi^{2}= 1.4 (< 5) emPhi Good #chi^{2}=0.99 (< 5) emEnergy Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 5) hadEm Good #chi^{2}=0.78 (< 5) emEt Good #chi^{2}= 1.7 (< 5) elecEtaevent Good #chi^{2}= 1.7 (< 5) elecPhi Good #chi^{2}= 1 (< 5) elecEnergy Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 5) elechadEm Good #chi^{2}=0.76 (< 5) elecEt Good #chi^{2}= 1.4 (< 5) photonEtaevent Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 5) photonPhi Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 5) photonEnergy Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 5) photonhadEm Good #chi^{2}=0.76 (< 5) photonEt Good #chi^{2}= 3.6 (< 5) positEtaevent Good #chi^{2}=0.74 (< 5) positPhi Good #chi^{2}= 0.6 (< 5) positEnergy Good #chi^{2}=0.93 (< 5) posithadEm Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 5) positEt Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 5) elecEoverP Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 5) positEoverP Good #chi^{2}= 1.8 (< 5) Delta x Good #chi^{2}= 2.3 (< 5) Delta y Good #chi^{2}= 2 (< 5) Delta r Good #chi^{2}= 3 (< 5) lshr Good #chi^{2}=0.84 (< 5) cesWL3NoL2east Low Stat Low Stat cesWL3NoL2west Low Stat Low Stat ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ====================================================================== ======================================================== TrackMonitor::summary(): Run178440 Events 9.88e+04 ======================================================== Generic Checker: Histogram name Result Chi^2 -------------------------------------------------------- Track Z_0 Good 0.347(< 10.0) Impact Para Good 0.349(< 10.0) Track Rapidity Good 0.376(< 10.0) Track Phi Good 1.31 (< 10.0) # of COT Tracks Good 3.78 % (< 20%) Sing(Q)/Track pT Good 0.368(< 10.0) ======================================================== General decision for Run178440 => OK ======================================================== ====================================================================== MuonMonitor::summary(): Run 178440 Events: 49366 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the ObjectMon web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ====================================================================== CMU phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) CMP phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1 (< 3) CMX phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) BMU phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.4 (< 3) CMU Z (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 3) CMX Z (Stub) Good #chi^{2}=0.99 (< 3) BMU Z (Stub) Good #chi^{2}=0.97 (< 3) Charge/p_{T} Good #chi^{2}= 1.5 (< 3) CMU dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.4 (< 3) CMP dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.6 (< 3) CMX dx Good #chi^{2}=0.48 (< 3) BMU dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Muon CMU phi Good #chi^{2}=0.86 (< 3) Muon CMP phi Good #chi^{2}=0.68 (< 3) Muon CMX phi Good #chi^{2}= 1.4 (< 3) Muon BMU phi Good #chi^{2}=0.89 (< 3) MuonCMU eta Good #chi^{2}=0.95 (< 3) MuonCMP eta Good #chi^{2}=0.91 (< 3) MuonCMX eta Good #chi^{2}=0.98 (< 3) MuonBMU eta Good #chi^{2}=0.61 (< 3) Muon type Good #chi^{2}= 1.8 (< 3) Number of Muons Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ====================================================================== ======================================================== TauMonitor::summary(): Run178440 Events 3.71e+03 ======================================================== Generic Checker: Histogram name Result KS Test -------------------------------------------------------- Tau Pt Good 0.971(< 5)) Tau Mass Good 0.976(< 5)) Tau Rapidity Good 0.912(< 5)) Track MultiplicityGood 1.26 (< 5)) Tau Charge Good 0.872(< 5) Tau Phi Good 1.48 (< 5) ======================================================== General decision for Run178440 => OK ======================================================== JpsiMonitor::summary() Run 178440 events 8511 Check 1 +----------------------------------------------+ |dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 1.08e+15 | | NDF 17 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 2 +----------------------------------------------+ |cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 1.12e+15 | | NDF 17 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 3 +----------------------------------------------+ |cmp dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 2.41e+14 | | NDF 16 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 4 cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 5 +----------------------------------------------+ |at least one cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 1.1e+15 | | NDF 17 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 6 +----------------------------------------------+ |at least one cmp dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 1.43e+15 | | NDF 17 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 7 at least one cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 8 +----------------------------------------------+ |everything muon + only cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 9.27e+14 | | NDF 17 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 9 everything muon + only cmp dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 10 everything muon + only cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics ====================================================================== SVXMonitor::summary(): Run 178440 Events: 8511 ====================================================================== Track chi2 - good Not Checked Not Checked Track chi2 - jpsi Not Checked Not Checked Track chi2 - jet Not Checked Not Checked ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Efficiency by wedgeNot Checked Not Checked Track d0 Not Checked Not Checked number of silicon hitsNot Checked Not Checked Track chi2 Not Checked Not Checked number of tracks Not Checked Not Checked number of SVT trks per wedgeNot Checked Not Checked number of COT trks per wedgeNot Checked Not Checked Track d0 - good Not Checked Not Checked number of silicon hits - goodNot Checked Not Checked Track chi2 - good Not Checked Not Checked Track d0 - jpsi Not Checked Not Checked number of silicon hits - jpsiNot Checked Not Checked Track chi2 - jpsi Not Checked Not Checked Track d0 - jet Not Checked Not Checked number of silicon hits - jetNot Checked Not Checked Track chi2 - jet Not Checked Not Checked ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ======================================================================