============================================================ ObjectMon::summary(): Run 168099 Events: 7307 started at 168099 ended at 168099 ------------------------------------------------------------ For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the ObjectMon web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ============================================================ ------------------------------- TimeMonitor:: proccesssed 7307 events General Decision - run is GOOD Reference file used: /data1/consumer/referenceFiles/ObjectMon/TimeMonitor_physics.root The cutoffs for the used methods are: method: Komogorov cutoff: 0.01 method: Chi2 cutoff: 5 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 54 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 54 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 54 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 7350 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 8141 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 8141 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 113069 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 125387 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Chi2 returned 25.9044 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 125387 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.25188 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 37057 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 42329 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.4554 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 42329 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.20045 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 132560 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.93062 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 132560 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.784242 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 102460 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 56 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 56 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 56 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 7110 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 7696 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 7696 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 111148 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 123226 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Chi2 returned 25.8691 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 123226 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.85899 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 35706 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 40923 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.66658 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 40923 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.861635 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 129174 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.14949 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 129174 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.18745 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 100045 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 39 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 40 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 40 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 3379 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 3664 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 3664 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 57193 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 63640 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Chi2 returned 16.0027 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 63640 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.78536 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 18361 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 21126 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 3.28136 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 21126 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.13844 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 65212 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 11.1025 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 65212 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.19588 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 50998 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 26 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 26 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 26 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 3562 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 3820 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 3820 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 58997 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 65404 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Chi2 returned 15.8068 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 65404 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.93637 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 19116 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 21651 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.89483 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 21651 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.21519 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 66497 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.58127 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 66497 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.29012 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 51927 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 0 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 238 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 256 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 256 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 3700 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 4190 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.27916 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 4190 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.742626 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 1275 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 1475 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.510596 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 1475 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.13322 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 4547 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.10324 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 4547 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.03637 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 3453 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 14 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 14 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 14 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 1912 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 2057 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 2057 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 28830 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 32120 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 7.6226 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 32120 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.55756 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 9705 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 11069 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.34924 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 11069 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.0298 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 34394 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.921785 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 34394 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.14969 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 26724 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 4 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 4 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 4 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 152 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 163 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 163 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 1861 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 2074 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 3.12381 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 2074 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.02426 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 646 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 731 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.19557 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 731 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.13203 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 2515 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.09041 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 2515 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.690642 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 1932 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 0 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 1 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 1 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 114 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 138 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 138 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 1770 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 2138 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.785627 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 2138 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.04914 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 549 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 695 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.706756 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 695 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.885184 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 2635 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.47616 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 2635 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.895847 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 1855 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 5 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 5 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 5 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 696 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 758 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 758 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 11346 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 12771 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.98855 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 12771 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.19034 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 3631 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 4232 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.516204 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 4232 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.22337 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 13664 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.49173 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 13664 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 0.985159 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 10579 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 23 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 23 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 23 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 2635 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 2828 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 2828 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 44088 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 48864 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Chi2 returned 15.4329 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 48864 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 2.25194 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 14279 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 16480 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.26708 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 16480 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.63332 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 50222 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.44295 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 50222 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Chi2 returned 1.32271 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 39355 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 ----- Bad/Improved EMTiming channels summary ----- bad channels reference file was taken from run#164797 cuts used for every tower were (current/old): minimal high efficiency: 0.95/0.95 maximal # of low width hits: 4/4 maximal # of multifirings: 4/4 maximal # of fake firings: 3/3 wedge rapd Failures: 100% LowW Multi Fake Change Status 0 -17 00/00 1/1 1/1 0/0 0 -15 01/01 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 -13 10/10 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 -11 10/10 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 -9 10/10 0/0 0/0 0/0 23 -14 01/01 0/0 0/0 0/0 23 -10 01/01 0/1 0/1 0/0 New Problem The following information could be put into the new bad channels reference file: 168099 4 0.95 4 4 3 0 8 12 0 10 2 0 12 1 0 14 1 0 16 1 23 11 2 23 15 2 ================================================== JetMonitor::summary(): Run 168099 Events 7307 ================================================== For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the JetMonitor web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html -------------------------------------------------- Histogram name Check Result -------------------------------------------------- JCl-071_sumEt mean > 40.0 PASSED JCl-071_sumEt mean < 200.0 PASSED JCl-071_eta mean < 0.25 PASSED JCl-071_eta mean > -0.25 PASSED JCl-071_eta [-3.0;-1.0] * 0.5 < [1.0;3.0] PASSED JCl-071_eta [-3.0;-1.0] * 1.5 > [1.0;3.0] PASSED -------------------------------------------------- Histogram name Result Chi^2 1.) phi Njet Central PASSED 0.863 2.) phi Njet East Plug PASSED 1.19 3.) phi Njet West Plug PASSED 0.915 ================================================== General decision for Run 168099 => OK ================================================== ============================================================ MetMonitor::summary(): Run 168099 Events 7307 ============================================================ For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the JetMonitor web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ------------------------------------------------------------ Histogram name Check Result ------------------------------------------------------------ Met KS-Test PASSED Met all #phi KS-Test PASSED Met >35 #phi KS-Test PASSED Met >45 #phi KS-Test Low stat exSum KS-Test PASSED eySum KS-Test PASSED eSum KS-Test PASSED etSum KS-Test PASSED ============================================================ General decision for Run 168099 => OK ============================================================ ============================================================ EMMonitor::summary(): Run 168099 Events 7307 ============================================================ For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the JetMonitor web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ------------------------------------------------------------ Histogram name Check Result ------------------------------------------------------------ EMCluster #eta KS-Test PASSED EMCluster #phi KS-Test PASSED EMCluster Energy KS-Test PASSED EMCluster hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED EMCluster emEt KS-Test PASSED EMCluster #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Electron #eta KS-Test PASSED Electron #phi KS-Test PASSED Electron Energy KS-Test PASSED Electron hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED Electron emEt KS-Test PASSED Electron #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Photon #eta KS-Test PASSED Photon #phi KS-Test PASSED Photon Energy KS-Test PASSED Photon hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED Photon emEt KS-Test PASSED Photon #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Positron #eta KS-Test PASSED Positron #phi KS-Test PASSED Positron Energy KS-Test PASSED Positron hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED Positron emEt KS-Test PASSED Positron #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Electron E/P KS-Test PASSED Electron EtaAddr vs PhiAddr KS-Test PASSED Positron E/P KS-Test PASSED ============================================================ General decision for Run 168099 => OK ============================================================ ======================================================== TrackMonitor::summary(): Run168099 Events 2.43e+05 ======================================================== Generic Checker: Histogram name Result Chi^2 -------------------------------------------------------- Track Z_0 Good 0.457(< 10.0) Impact Para Good 0.398(< 10.0) Track Rapidity Good 0.413(< 10.0) Track Phi Good 1.8 (< 10.0) # of COT Tracks Good 1.64 % (< 20%) Sing(Q)/Track pT Good 1.72 (< 10.0) ======================================================== General decision for Run168099 => OK ======================================================== ====================================================================== MuonMonitor::summary(): Run 168099 Events: 67439 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the ObjectMon web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ====================================================================== CMU phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}=0.83 (< 3) CMP phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.4 (< 3) CMX phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.3 (< 3) BMU phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 2.2 (< 3) CMU Z (Stub) Good #chi^{2}=0.77 (< 3) CMX Z (Stub) Bad #chi^{2}= 3.2 (> 3) BMU Z (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) Charge/p_{T} Bad #chi^{2}= 3.2 (> 3) Charge/p_{T} Bmu Good #chi^{2}=0.43 (< 3) CMU dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.3 (< 3) CMP dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.7 (< 3) CMX dx Good #chi^{2}= 0.4 (< 3) BMU dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.8 (< 3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Muon CMU phi Good #chi^{2}= 1.6 (< 3) Muon CMP phi Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 3) Muon CMX phi Good #chi^{2}=0.75 (< 3) Muon BMU phi Good #chi^{2}= 1.5 (< 3) MuonCMU eta Good #chi^{2}= 1.5 (< 3) MuonCMP eta Good #chi^{2}= 1.6 (< 3) MuonCMX eta Good #chi^{2}=0.87 (< 3) MuonBMU eta Good #chi^{2}= 2.1 (< 3) Muon type Bad #chi^{2}= 14 (> 3) Number of Muons Bad #chi^{2}= 6.4 (> 3) Number of Muons BmuBad #chi^{2}= 3.3 (> 3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ====================================================================== ======================================================== TauMonitor::summary(): Run168099 Events 1.71e+03 ======================================================== Generic Checker: Histogram name Result KS Test -------------------------------------------------------- Tau Pt Good 1.35 (< 5)) Tau Mass Good 0.707(< 5)) Tau Rapidity Good 0.628(< 5)) Track MultiplicityGood 0.489(< 5)) Tau Charge Good 0.707(< 5) Tau Phi Good 1.52 (< 5) ======================================================== General decision for Run168099 => OK ======================================================== JpsiMonitor::summary() Run 168099 events 7307 Check 1 +----------------------------------------------+ |dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 239 +/- 26.6 | | mass 3.08 +/- 0.00238 | | width 0.0249 +/- 0.00265 | | chi2 11.4 | | NDF 14 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 2 +----------------------------------------------+ |cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 244 +/- 25.9 | | mass 3.08 +/- 0.0023 | | width 0.0249 +/- 0.00256 | | chi2 7.66 | | NDF 14 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 3 cmp dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 4 cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 5 +----------------------------------------------+ |at least one cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 244 +/- 26.4 | | mass 3.08 +/- 0.00234 | | width 0.0251 +/- 0.00261 | | chi2 8.8 | | NDF 14 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 6 +----------------------------------------------+ |at least one cmp dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 157 +/- 18.5 | | mass 3.08 +/- 0.00257 | | width 0.0237 +/- 0.00298 | | chi2 20.3 | | NDF 14 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 7 at least one cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 8 +----------------------------------------------+ |everything muon + only cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 210 +/- 24.4 | | mass 3.08 +/- 0.00248 | | width 0.0244 +/- 0.00273 | | chi2 9.9 | | NDF 14 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 9 everything muon + only cmp dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 10 everything muon + only cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics ====================================================================== SVXMonitor::summary(): Run 168099 Events: 67439 ====================================================================== ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Efficiency by wedgeNot Checked Not Checked Track d0 Not Checked Not Checked number of silicon hitsNot Checked Not Checked Track chi2 Not Checked Not Checked number of tracks Not Checked Not Checked number of SVT trks per wedgeNot Checked Not Checked number of COT trks per wedgeNot Checked Not Checked Track d0 - jpsi Not Checked Not Checked number of silicon hits - jpsiNot Checked Not Checked Track chi2 - jpsi Not Checked Not Checked Track d0 - jet Not Checked Not Checked number of silicon hits - jetNot Checked Not Checked Track chi2 - jet Not Checked Not Checked ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ======================================================================