============================================================ ObjectMon::summary(): Run 165365 Events: 70732 started at 165365 ended at 165365 ------------------------------------------------------------ For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the ObjectMon web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ============================================================ ------------------------------- TimeMonitor:: proccesssed 70732 events General Decision - run is GOOD Reference file used: /data1/consumer/referenceFiles/ObjectMon/TimeMonitor_physics.root The cutoffs for the used methods are: method: Komogorov cutoff: 0.01 method: Chi2 cutoff: 5 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 4 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 4 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 4 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 3133 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 4691 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 4691 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 1359 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 2508 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 2508 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 2 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 2 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 104 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 105 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 105 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 14266 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 16251 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 16251 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 207335 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 230843 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 230843 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 69779 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 79739 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 79739 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 267651 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 267651 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 201819 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 71 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 74 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 74 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 11954 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 13373 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 13373 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 174785 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 194321 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 194321 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 58622 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 67519 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 67519 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 219685 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 219685 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 166779 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 316 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 323 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 323 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 40142 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 43424 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 43424 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 620227 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 685714 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 685714 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 206483 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 235674 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 235674 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 762402 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 762402 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 589136 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 181 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 181 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 181 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 23621 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 25011 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 25011 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 373976 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 412248 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 412248 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 126113 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 144067 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 144067 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 455057 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 455057 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 355057 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 ----- Bad EMTiming channels summary ----- bad channels reference file was taken from run#164797 cuts used for every tower were (current/old): minimal high efficiency: 0.95/0.95 maximal # of low width hits: 4/4 maximal # of multifirings: 4/4 maximal # of fake firings: 3/3 wedge rapd Failures: 100% LowW Multi Fake New Problem 0 -17 00/00 1/1 1/1 0/0 0 -15 01/01 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 -13 10/10 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 -11 10/10 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 -9 10/10 0/0 0/0 0/0 23 -14 01/01 0/0 0/0 0/0 23 -10 01/01 0/1 0/1 0/0 The following information could be put into the new bad channels reference file: 165365 4 0.95 4 4 3 0 8 12 0 10 2 0 12 1 0 14 1 0 16 1 23 11 2 23 15 2 ================================================== JetMonitor::summary(): Run 165365 Events 70732 ================================================== For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the JetMonitor web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html -------------------------------------------------- Histogram name Check Result -------------------------------------------------- JCl-071_sumEt mean > 40.0 PASSED JCl-071_sumEt mean < 200.0 PASSED JCl-071_eta mean < 0.25 PASSED JCl-071_eta mean > -0.25 PASSED JCl-071_eta [-3.0;-1.0] * 0.5 < [1.0;3.0] PASSED JCl-071_eta [-3.0;-1.0] * 1.5 > [1.0;3.0] PASSED -------------------------------------------------- Histogram name Result Chi^2 1.) phi Njet Central PASSED 0.899 2.) phi Njet East Plug PASSED 0.729 3.) phi Njet West Plug PASSED 0.931 ================================================== General decision for Run 165365 => OK ================================================== ============================================================ MetMonitor::summary(): Run 165365 Events 70732 ============================================================ For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the JetMonitor web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ------------------------------------------------------------ Histogram name Check Result ------------------------------------------------------------ Met KS-Test PASSED Met all #phi KS-Test PASSED Met >35 #phi KS-Test PASSED Met >45 #phi KS-Test PASSED exSum KS-Test PASSED eySum KS-Test PASSED eSum KS-Test PASSED etSum KS-Test PASSED ============================================================ General decision for Run 165365 => OK ============================================================ ============================================================ EMMonitor::summary(): Run 165365 Events 70732 ============================================================ For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the JetMonitor web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ------------------------------------------------------------ Histogram name Check Result ------------------------------------------------------------ EMCluster #eta KS-Test PASSED EMCluster #phi KS-Test PASSED EMCluster Energy KS-Test PASSED EMCluster hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED EMCluster emEt KS-Test PASSED EMCluster #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Electron #eta KS-Test PASSED Electron #phi KS-Test PASSED Electron Energy KS-Test PASSED Electron hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED Electron emEt KS-Test PASSED Electron #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Photon #eta KS-Test PASSED Photon #phi KS-Test PASSED Photon Energy KS-Test PASSED Photon hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED Photon emEt KS-Test PASSED Photon #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Positron #eta KS-Test PASSED Positron #phi KS-Test PASSED Positron Energy KS-Test PASSED Positron hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED Positron emEt KS-Test PASSED Positron #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Electron E/P KS-Test PASSED Electron EtaAddr vs PhiAddr KS-Test PASSED Positron E/P KS-Test PASSED ============================================================ General decision for Run 165365 => OK ============================================================ ======================================================== TrackMonitor::summary(): Run165365 Events 3.04e+06 ======================================================== Generic Checker: Histogram name Result Chi^2 -------------------------------------------------------- Track Z_0 Good 1.42 (< 10.0) Impact Para Good 2.03 (< 10.0) Track Rapidity Good 0.9 (< 10.0) Track Phi Good 8.91 (< 10.0) # of COT Tracks Good 1.25 % (< 20%) Sing(Q)/Track pT Good 4.72 (< 10.0) ======================================================== General decision for Run165365 => OK ======================================================== ====================================================================== MuonMonitor::summary(): Run 165365 Events: 235856 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the ObjectMon web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ====================================================================== CMU phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 3) CMP phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.4 (< 3) CMX phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) BMU phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}=0.97 (< 3) CMU Z (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1 (< 3) CMX Z (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.3 (< 3) BMU Z (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 3) Charge/p_{T} Good #chi^{2}= 1.7 (< 3) Charge/p_{T} Bmu Good #chi^{2}= 1.3 (< 3) CMU dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.3 (< 3) CMP dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) CMX dx Good #chi^{2}=0.88 (< 3) BMU dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Muon CMU phi Good #chi^{2}= 1.1 (< 3) Muon CMP phi Good #chi^{2}=0.95 (< 3) Muon CMX phi Good #chi^{2}=0.95 (< 3) Muon BMU phi Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) MuonCMU eta Good #chi^{2}= 1.8 (< 3) MuonCMP eta Good #chi^{2}=0.66 (< 3) MuonCMX eta Good #chi^{2}=0.91 (< 3) MuonBMU eta Good #chi^{2}= 0.7 (< 3) Muon type Good #chi^{2}=0.46 (< 3) Number of Muons Bad #chi^{2}= 18 (> 3) Number of Muons BmuGood #chi^{2}= 1 (< 3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ====================================================================== ======================================================== TauMonitor::summary(): Run165365 Events 1.24e+04 ======================================================== Generic Checker: Histogram name Result KS Test -------------------------------------------------------- Tau Pt Good 1.14 (< 5)) Tau Mass Good 0.896(< 5)) Tau Rapidity Good 1.14 (< 5)) Track MultiplicityGood 0.634(< 5)) Tau Charge Good 0.745(< 5) Tau Phi Good 2.07 (< 5) ======================================================== General decision for Run165365 => OK ======================================================== JpsiMonitor::summary() Run 165365 events 70732 Check 1 +----------------------------------------------+ |dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 6.54e+03 | | NDF 27 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 2 +----------------------------------------------+ |cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 1.81e+04 | | NDF 24 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 3 +----------------------------------------------+ |cmp dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 608 | | NDF 21 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 4 cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 5 +----------------------------------------------+ |at least one cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 1.65e+04 | | NDF 27 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 6 +----------------------------------------------+ |at least one cmp dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 3.04e+03 | | NDF 25 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 7 at least one cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 8 +----------------------------------------------+ |everything muon + only cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 1.55e+04 | | NDF 27 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 9 everything muon + only cmp dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 10 everything muon + only cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics