============================================================ ObjectMon::summary(): Run 165269 Events: 2607 started at 165269 ended at 165269 ------------------------------------------------------------ For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the ObjectMon web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ============================================================ ------------------------------- TimeMonitor:: proccesssed 2607 events General Decision - run is GOOD Reference file used: /data1/consumer/referenceFiles/ObjectMon/TimeMonitor_physics.root The cutoffs for the used methods are: method: Komogorov cutoff: 0.01 method: Chi2 cutoff: 5 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 5 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 5 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 12 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 57 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 57 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 348 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 2024 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 2024 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 1 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 243 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 1339 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 1339 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 3122 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 3122 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 1 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 294 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 1 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 1 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 233 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 313 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 313 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 148 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 207 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 207 entries: LOOKS BAD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 47 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 50 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 50 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 7449 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 8397 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 8397 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 101685 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 113157 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 113157 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 34226 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 39125 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 39125 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 130511 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 130511 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 99118 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist TDCEff_ECEM with 10 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist RawWidthCEM with 10 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist t0RawCEM with 10 entries: LOOKS no decision Checked Hist TDCEff_EPEM with 1152 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthPEM with 1281 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPEM with 1281 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffCHA with 16659 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthCHA with 18514 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawCHA with 18514 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffWHA with 5365 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 Checked Hist RawWidthWHA with 6062 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawWHA with 6062 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist RawWidthPHA with 19969 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist t0RawPHA with 19969 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Unsimilarity Check returned 0 Checked Hist HADTDCEffPHA75 with 15419 entries: LOOKS GOOD Method used: Efficiency Check returned 1 ----- Bad EMTiming channels summary ----- bad channels reference file was taken from run#164797 cuts used for every tower were (current/old): minimal high efficiency: 0.95/0.95 maximal # of low width hits: 4/4 maximal # of multifirings: 4/4 maximal # of fake firings: 3/3 wedge rapd Failures: 100% LowW Multi Fake New Problem 0 -17 00/00 1/1 0/1 0/0 0 -15 01/01 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 -13 10/10 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 -11 10/10 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 -9 10/10 0/0 0/0 0/0 22 -12 10/00 0/0 0/0 0/0 new 23 -14 01/01 0/0 0/0 0/0 23 -12 10/00 0/0 0/0 0/0 new 23 -10 01/01 0/1 0/1 0/0 The following information could be put into the new bad channels reference file: 165269 4 0.95 4 4 3 0 8 4 0 10 2 0 12 1 0 14 1 0 16 1 22 13 1 23 11 2 23 13 1 23 15 2 ================================================== JetMonitor::summary(): Run 165269 Events 2607 ================================================== For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the JetMonitor web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html -------------------------------------------------- Histogram name Check Result -------------------------------------------------- JCl-071_sumEt mean > 40.0 PASSED JCl-071_sumEt mean < 200.0 PASSED JCl-071_eta mean < 0.25 PASSED JCl-071_eta mean > -0.25 PASSED JCl-071_eta [-3.0;-1.0] * 0.5 < [1.0;3.0] PASSED JCl-071_eta [-3.0;-1.0] * 1.5 > [1.0;3.0] PASSED -------------------------------------------------- Histogram name Result Chi^2 1.) phi Njet Central PASSED 0.981 2.) phi Njet East Plug low statistics 3.) phi Njet West Plug low statistics ================================================== General decision for Run 165269 => CANNOTTELL ================================================== ============================================================ MetMonitor::summary(): Run 165269 Events 2607 ============================================================ For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the JetMonitor web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ------------------------------------------------------------ Histogram name Check Result ------------------------------------------------------------ Met KS-Test PASSED Met all #phi KS-Test PASSED Met >35 #phi KS-Test Low stat Met >45 #phi KS-Test Low stat exSum KS-Test PASSED eySum KS-Test PASSED eSum KS-Test PASSED etSum KS-Test PASSED ============================================================ General decision for Run 165269 => OK ============================================================ ============================================================ EMMonitor::summary(): Run 165269 Events 2607 ============================================================ For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the JetMonitor web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ------------------------------------------------------------ Histogram name Check Result ------------------------------------------------------------ EMCluster #eta KS-Test PASSED EMCluster #phi KS-Test PASSED EMCluster Energy KS-Test PASSED EMCluster hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED EMCluster emEt KS-Test PASSED EMCluster #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Electron #eta KS-Test PASSED Electron #phi KS-Test PASSED Electron Energy KS-Test PASSED Electron hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED Electron emEt KS-Test PASSED Electron #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Photon #eta KS-Test PASSED Photon #phi KS-Test PASSED Photon Energy KS-Test PASSED Photon hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED Photon emEt KS-Test PASSED Photon #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Positron #eta KS-Test PASSED Positron #phi KS-Test PASSED Positron Energy KS-Test PASSED Positron hadE/emE KS-Test PASSED Positron emEt KS-Test PASSED Positron #eta vs #phi KS-Test PASSED Electron E/P KS-Test PASSED Electron EtaAddr vs PhiAddr KS-Test PASSED Positron E/P KS-Test PASSED ============================================================ General decision for Run 165269 => OK ============================================================ ======================================================== TrackMonitor::summary(): Run165269 Events 1.34e+05 ======================================================== Generic Checker: Histogram name Result Chi^2 -------------------------------------------------------- Track Z_0 Good 0.308(< 10.0) Impact Para Good 0.452(< 10.0) Track Rapidity Good 0.24 (< 10.0) Track Phi Good 1.2 (< 10.0) # of COT Tracks Good 0.844% (< 20%) Sing(Q)/Track pT Good 1.07 (< 10.0) ======================================================== General decision for Run165269 => OK ======================================================== ====================================================================== MuonMonitor::summary(): Run 165269 Events: 18620 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For detailed definition of the checks and the histograms we refer you to the ObjectMon web page: http://www-b0.fnal.gov:8000/consumer/objectmon/objectmon.html ====================================================================== CMU phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.6 (< 3) CMP phi (Stub) Good #chi^{2}= 1.6 (< 3) CMX phi (Stub) Low Stat Low Stat BMU phi (Stub) Low Stat Low Stat CMU Z (Stub) Good #chi^{2}=0.83 (< 3) CMX Z (Stub) Low Stat Low Stat BMU Z (Stub) Low Stat Low Stat Charge/p_{T} Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) Charge/p_{T} Bmu Low Stat Low Stat CMU dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.6 (< 3) CMP dx Good #chi^{2}= 1.3 (< 3) CMX dx Low Stat Low Stat BMU dx Low Stat Low Stat ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Muon CMU phi Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) Muon CMP phi Good #chi^{2}= 2 (< 3) Muon CMX phi Low Stat Low Stat Muon BMU phi Low Stat Low Stat MuonCMU eta Good #chi^{2}= 1.3 (< 3) MuonCMP eta Good #chi^{2}=0.71 (< 3) MuonCMX eta Low Stat Low Stat MuonBMU eta Low Stat Low Stat Muon type Bad #chi^{2}= 5.9 (> 3) Number of Muons Good #chi^{2}= 1.2 (< 3) Number of Muons BmuGood #chi^{2}=0.23 (< 3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ====================================================================== ======================================================== TauMonitor::summary(): Run165269 Events 563 ======================================================== Generic Checker: Histogram name Result KS Test -------------------------------------------------------- Tau Pt Good 0.796(< 5)) Tau Mass Good 0.488(< 5)) Tau Rapidity Good 0.613(< 5)) Track MultiplicityGood 0.563(< 5)) Tau Charge Good 0.411(< 5) Tau Phi Good 0.971(< 5) ======================================================== General decision for Run165269 => OK ======================================================== JpsiMonitor::summary() Run 165269 events 2607 Check 1 +----------------------------------------------+ |dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 129 | | NDF 24 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 2 +----------------------------------------------+ |cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 97.1 | | NDF 19 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 3 cmp dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 4 cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 5 +----------------------------------------------+ |at least one cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 148 | | NDF 22 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 6 at least one cmp dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 7 at least one cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 8 +----------------------------------------------+ |everything muon + only cmu dimuon mass | +----------------------------------------------+ | entries 0 +/- 0 | | mass 3.1 +/- 0 | | width 0.03 +/- 0 | | chi2 95.2 | | NDF 21 | | NPAR 7 | +----------------------------------------------+ Check 9 everything muon + only cmp dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics Check 10 everything muon + only cmx dimuon mass : Fit WAS NOT PERFORMED due to insufficient statistics